<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Classic comes to iPod Video. Ok, but why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: iPod Owner</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93312</link>
		<dc:creator>iPod Owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 01:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93312</guid>
		<description>I own both versions, (the old iPod Classic and the new iPod Classic), and when I got the new one, I almost THREW IT AWAY!
The interface lags, and is such a pain compared to my simplistic, older ipod.
I returned my new one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own both versions, (the old iPod Classic and the new iPod Classic), and when I got the new one, I almost THREW IT AWAY!<br />
The interface lags, and is such a pain compared to my simplistic, older ipod.<br />
I returned my new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mongchacha</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93239</link>
		<dc:creator>mongchacha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93239</guid>
		<description>doobybrain...you should've known that when you wrote this entry nearly a year ago you were going to hurt ifanboys' feelings in the FUTURE! you should have known better than to stir up their delicate emotions! didn't you know that right after reading this entry they turned to their apple products and petted them saying, "it's ok it's ok...doobybrain didn't mean what he said."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doobybrain&#8230;you should&#8217;ve known that when you wrote this entry nearly a year ago you were going to hurt ifanboys&#8217; feelings in the FUTURE! you should have known better than to stir up their delicate emotions! didn&#8217;t you know that right after reading this entry they turned to their apple products and petted them saying, &#8220;it&#8217;s ok it&#8217;s ok&#8230;doobybrain didn&#8217;t mean what he said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: israel102</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93177</link>
		<dc:creator>israel102</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93177</guid>
		<description>you fail as a blogger. it is painfully clear from your post that you never even installed this on your ipod, yet you criticize anyway. this post &lt;I&gt;should&lt;I&gt; have been about a hack that represents a breakthrough in ipod hacking. yet instead, you chose to make it a way to rant about how much you dont like ipod classic's UI. maybe you just really dont like the ipod classic and maybe you just though a post against a liked thing would make it more interesting. either way, you missed the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you fail as a blogger. it is painfully clear from your post that you never even installed this on your ipod, yet you criticize anyway. this post <i>should</i><i> have been about a hack that represents a breakthrough in ipod hacking. yet instead, you chose to make it a way to rant about how much you dont like ipod classic&#8217;s UI. maybe you just really dont like the ipod classic and maybe you just though a post against a liked thing would make it more interesting. either way, you missed the point.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobybrain</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93175</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobybrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93175</guid>
		<description>Yes, definitely lots of better things now. Excited for the new news!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, definitely lots of better things now. Excited for the new news!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SportsGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93173</link>
		<dc:creator>SportsGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93173</guid>
		<description>Your stupid. And yeah, this is old news now, and there are way better things, and even better things coming up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your stupid. And yeah, this is old news now, and there are way better things, and even better things coming up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doobybrain</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93149</link>
		<dc:creator>Doobybrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93149</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I will make sure my facts are strait next time before I post this crap! Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I will make sure my facts are strait next time before I post this crap! Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forgoten Dynasty</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93148</link>
		<dc:creator>Forgoten Dynasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-93148</guid>
		<description>Wow what a retard!

every single one of your facts are wrong.
The firmware wasn't developed to give it the same features it was developed to give users who like the classic feel the same look.
Secondly the search feature isn't an update from the classic hack its built in to 5.5G ipods on a non edited firmware by default.
thirdly their are MANY other options other then this this was (again) Developed for the people who WANT the classic feel.
and finally it not "unofficial/unsupported" its a edited version of apple's OFFICIAL 1.2.1 firmware

maybe you should get your facts strait before posting crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a retard!</p>
<p>every single one of your facts are wrong.<br />
The firmware wasn&#8217;t developed to give it the same features it was developed to give users who like the classic feel the same look.<br />
Secondly the search feature isn&#8217;t an update from the classic hack its built in to 5.5G ipods on a non edited firmware by default.<br />
thirdly their are MANY other options other then this this was (again) Developed for the people who WANT the classic feel.<br />
and finally it not &#8220;unofficial/unsupported&#8221; its a edited version of apple&#8217;s OFFICIAL 1.2.1 firmware</p>
<p>maybe you should get your facts strait before posting crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberw00ter</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-64537</link>
		<dc:creator>uberw00ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-64537</guid>
		<description>This is amazing cuz classic firmware is the best of any iPod to date. I had both the video and the classic but I say the Classic firmware is way easier to navigate. XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amazing cuz classic firmware is the best of any iPod to date. I had both the video and the classic but I say the Classic firmware is way easier to navigate. XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver's follower</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-60947</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver's follower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-60947</guid>
		<description>I agree with SILVER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with SILVER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-51186</link>
		<dc:creator>Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doobybrain.com/2007/10/16/ipod-classic-comes-to-ipod-video-ok-but-why/#comment-51186</guid>
		<description>Loks like some dimwit is extremely jealous of the new iPod Classic. Quit the whining because you dodn't get it for christmas and go back to the zune-rat-hole you might consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loks like some dimwit is extremely jealous of the new iPod Classic. Quit the whining because you dodn&#8217;t get it for christmas and go back to the zune-rat-hole you might consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
